Tripazon

Ever wonder why those lense manufacturer never had designed lense with f-number smaller than f1.2? F-number is representing the size of the maximum aperture or opening diameter of lense. The smaller the f-number is, the larger is the lense aperture. The larger the aperture is, the higher the permeability of light is the lense. Thus, higher shutter speed is allowable for the same brightness of the image captured.

That is why the Nikkor 35mm f1.8 fixed lense is better for night photography where ambient lighting is limited. With its f-number of 1.8, it could absorb 3.5 times more light than those zoom lenses with aperture number of f5.6. So, for any night scene where Nikkor 18-55mm f5.6 kit lense needs shutter speed of at least 1 whole second normally, if Nikkor 35mm f1.8 is used instead, I could shoot the same scene with 3.5 times faster shutter speed of 0.1 second.

Back to the first question: If larger aperture results in faster lense, why shouldn’t those lense manufacturer like Nikon, Canon or Leica make any lense with f-number smaller than 1.2? To understand this, we need to know another characteristic of large aperture towards the image captured by the image sensor: the Depth Of Field, or DOF. Depth of Field is a relative measurement of how deep the background and foreground of the image captured are in focus. The larger aperture of smaller the f-number is, the shallower is the depth-of-field of the image. The shallower the DOF is, the thinner is the image plane where is in-focus. For f-number of 1.4, the in-focus plane is only a couple of mm thick which means anything 10mm further or nearer than the focus point will turn out blur or out-of-focus. This is why designing lense with aperture value of less than f1.2 is simply useless practically where lense can hardly focus on the object precisely with that superduper shallow DOF of perhaps less than 1 mm!

Flower isolated

So, shallow DOF is the limiting factor of the usefulness of fast lense with f-number of less than 2 where focusing to the exact point of object has become the critical factor. Same with the Nikkor 35mm f1.8 prime lense that I’ve fixed onto my Nikon D60. Its small maximum f-number of 1.8 also leads to a very shallow Depth-Of-Field especially when taking close-up shots. As you could see from the above photo, other than the main object of the red flower, objects in the background which are beyond 5mm behind the flower are all way out-of-focus. Off course, this helps in creating desired impact to this kind of artistic shot! :)

Actually, it’s kind of pro’s and con’s of this Nikkor 35mm f1.8. The above photo was shot with my Nikon D60 handheld, arm resting on dining chair, with shutter speed of 0.125s, f1.8, and ISO200. On one hand, if I used the kit lense of Nikkor 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 at 35mm to shoot the same object instead, I would need a tripod, in order to capture sharp image with shutter speed of 3.5 times slower or 1 whole second. On the other hand, shallow DOF has made this photo shot tricky to focus correctly on the exact desired point, for this case is the flower petals.

Mind you, I have still not touched on the issue of lense sharpness over the different f-number of aperture value. For Nikkor 35mm f1.8 prime lense, when it is wide open with the aperture of f1.8, some light fall-off as well as the aberrations of wide opened lense have inevitably softened the image captured, slightly, like the photo above. - Travel Feeder.

The above photo was captured with Nikon D60

Related Posts with Thumbnails

p/s: If you think this travel blog is worth for your reading, please support me by one of these ways: Subscribe to Travel Feeder’s feeds for free upcoming stories via RSS or email; Search and purchase my favourite photos from istockphoto; Get your travel gadget and Nikon D7000 or other photography equipments through my link to Adorama, B&H Photo or Amazon or ShaShinki (if you are in Malaysia) while you won’t lose anything, I could earn some commission, or, buy me a cup of coffee if you see me in Europe! Thank you.

Subscribe to Travel Feeder's RSS Feed For FREE Updated Stories!

Travel Feeder Photo e-Store

7 Comments to “Superduper Shallow Depth Of Field Of Nikkor 35mm f1.8 Lense”

  1. cecil says:

    >Che-Cheh,
    Thanks. :)
    Compliment means encouragement to me!

  2. MeiTeng says:

    Beautiful capture of the flower. Prime lens always give better quality photos.

  3. [...] months and all of the time I used it for night portrait shots, night scenes, isolated portraits and close-up photos. These are the main areas of photography where you need a fast lens and this little Nikkor baby is [...]

  4. akshay says:

    I am using Nikon D5000….I am interested in macro photography(insect and all)…..is that 35 mm 1.8 is suitable for my purpose…..and I also have kenko extension tubes.
    (I am not affordable for buy nikor mikro lens like Nikon 105 f2.8)

  5. cecil says:

    @akshay,
    If you are serious about macro photography, 35mm 1.8 might not be what you should opt for. Instead, any dedicated macro lens should do a better job in macro than the normal lens 35mm 1.8. If nikkor macro lens is out of your budget, you may think of other 3rd party lens such as Tamron SP60 or SP90, which are both very good value macro lenses. If macro lens are all too costly to you, the next choice should be 50mm f1.8 which is even cheaper but capture things bigger than 35mm f1.8, if you can focus your subject manually. :)

  6. akshay says:

    Thank you cecil……
    but I also have kenko extension tubes….I think 35mm would work with that……what says?
    and other thing is that which u mention Tamron SP60 or SP90.
    lens have any auto focus motar(like 35mm af-s 1.8)….because my D5000 not have any auto focus motar…then it will difficult 2 focus object

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

Page 1 of 11